Where the review platform runs
Ironwood runs in infrastructure your team controls.
CodeRabbit and Ironwood take different approaches. Ironwood is built for teams that want the review platform running in their own environment, their own AI-provider credentials and engineering context they control.
CodeRabbit is an established AI code review product and may be the better fit for teams that want a managed service and fast SaaS adoption. Ironwood is aimed at teams that place more weight on deployment control, AI-provider choice and running the review workflow inside infrastructure they manage.
This is not a feature-for-feature scorecard. It is the operating model Ironwood offers so you can decide whether that model matters to your team.
Ironwood runs in infrastructure your team controls.
Configure OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini or Ollama with credentials your team manages.
GitHub, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket.
Add codebase context, requirements, architecture documents and engineering knowledge.
Run more than one provider and inspect where findings agree or differ.
30 days for 2 developers with full Professional features and no credit card.
Professional is US$15 per active developer each month. Team is US$200 per month for up to 20 developers.
Your team controls where Ironwood runs, which source-control systems it connects to and which AI providers it uses.
See how self-hosted Ironwood works →The 30-day evaluation gives two developers the full Professional feature set. Connect your repositories and AI providers, then decide based on the reviews your team actually sees.